data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0743d/0743d6e50007cf02663dea62f12855813ba7aaae" alt="Comparison of molding tonnage in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The required tonnage utilizing external gas for the part is reduced by approximately 50%."
Comparison of molding tonnage in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The required tonnage utilizing external gas for the part is reduced by approximately 50%.
Gas-assist molding, which utilizes nitrogen gas pressure to form a part fully, offers significant cost-saving advantages while expanding design and manufacturing options for injection-molded components.
Traditional plastic processing delivers cost benefits through repeatable, high-volume production, but gas-assist molding furthers these savings. External gas-assist introduces a micro-thin layer of nitrogen gas during the packing phase, replacing the traditional holding phase. This reduces the required pressure to pack out a part, leading to lower molding pressures of 1-2 tons/in² and reducing clamp force requirements. As a result, manufacturers can utilize smaller, less expensive presses and achieve substantial cost savings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaaa6/aaaa6c90659b7675f23f64cb2b07b4877e0bad14" alt="Comparison of pressure in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The resulting pressure in external gas is approximately 30% lower than straight injection."
Comparison of pressure in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The resulting pressure in external gas is approximately 30% lower than straight injection.
Beyond press tonnage reduction, external gas-assist enables modifications to traditional part designs, such as increasing rib-to-wall ratios and allowing thicker ribs. These optimizations minimize differential shrinkage and reduce distortion, which in turn lowers scrap rates and enhances manufacturing efficiency. The primary trade-off is the need for more intricate tool design to seal gas from the external environment, but these initial tooling costs are often offset by long-term production savings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57f03/57f03fdd353098dafc6d8a56af97ce25ddff307d" alt="Comparison of sink mark displacement in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The displacement is lower when utilizing external gas, resulting in less readout on the cosmetic surface."
Comparison of sink mark displacement in straight injection (left) and external gas (right) processes. The displacement is lower when utilizing external gas, resulting in less readout on the cosmetic surface.
Enhancing Aesthetics, Performance, and Efficiency with Internal Gas-Assist
Internal gas-assist molding is an effective solution for producing thick parts with high aesthetic quality. Unlike the external gas-assist method, which shapes the outer surface, internal gas-assist introduces gas within the part’s geometry, creating a hollow channel through the thick region. This process forces the resin against the external walls, resulting in a packed-out appearance while maintaining structural integrity.
By evacuating resin from the center of the thick section, internal gas-assist enables the molding of extremely thick features without compromising surface finish. The removal of excess material can reduce part weight by 20% to 30%, which may be beneficial for applications where weight reduction enhances performance. Lighter parts can also contribute to lower freight costs, particularly in industries where shipping expenses are influenced by weight.
Additionally, because there is less material to cool, cycle times may be reduced compared to molding the same geometry as a solid part. Since press cycle times are often driven by the thickest areas of a part, this effect can contribute to overall process efficiency, potentially leading to higher throughput and some cost savings in production.
While the technique allows for superior aesthetics and the ability to mold challenging geometries, it does require more intricate tool design. As with external gas-assist, the increased tooling complexity and associated costs must be considered when determining the best approach for a given application.
Optimizing Production Efficiency
Gas-assist molding not only lowers manufacturing costs but also optimizes production efficiency by simplifying part design and reducing complexity. By integrating this process, manufacturers can produce lighter, more structurally sound components while using fewer resources and less energy. The long-term savings in materials, energy consumption, and equipment costs make gas-assist molding a valuable investment for cost-conscious manufacturers.